Analyzing the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility Framework under Companies Act 2013

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India stands at a unique crossroads. Unlike many countries where CSR remains a voluntary practice, India mandates CSR spending for certain companies under the Companies Act, 2013. This legal requirement, particularly under Section 135 and the accompanying CSR Rules, has sparked debate about whether CSR in India functions as voluntary corporate charity or as a form of mandatory corporate accountability. This paper explores the legal framework, enforcement mechanisms, and compliance obligations of CSR in India, supported by judicial interpretations and Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) circulars. It also examines the impact of mandatory CSR on corporate governance, stakeholder theory, and the ease of doing business, concluding with comparative insights and suggestions for reform.

Legal Framework of CSR under Companies Act, 2013

Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 introduced a pioneering approach by making CSR spending compulsory for companies meeting certain financial thresholds. The key provisions include:

• Applicability to companies with a net worth of ₹500 crore or more, or an annual turnover of ₹1000 crore or more, or a net profit of ₹5 crore or more during any financial year.

• Requirement to constitute a CSR Committee of the Board.

• Mandate to spend at least 2% of the average net profits of the preceding three years on CSR activities.

• Obligation to disclose CSR policy and activities in the Board’s report.

  
  

The CSR Rules, notified in 2014 and amended subsequently, provide detailed guidance on eligible CSR activities, implementation modalities, and reporting formats. These rules clarify that CSR activities must align with Schedule VII of the Act, which lists areas such as education, poverty eradication, healthcare, environmental sustainability, and rural development.

This framework marks a significant departure from voluntary CSR practices seen globally. It imposes a legal duty on qualifying companies to allocate resources for social causes, thereby embedding CSR into corporate governance.

Enforcement Mechanisms and Compliance Obligations

The Companies Act and CSR Rules establish a compliance regime that includes:

• Mandatory constitution of a CSR Committee to oversee policy formulation and implementation.

• Annual CSR reporting in the Board’s report and on the company’s website.

• Filing of Form CSR-2 with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) detailing CSR expenditure and activities.

• Penalties for non-compliance, including fines on the company and officers in default.

  
  

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has issued circulars to clarify ambiguities and strengthen enforcement. For example, MCA Circular No. 21/2014 emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in CSR spending. The MCA also clarified that unspent CSR funds should be transferred to specified funds under Schedule VII or carried forward with proper disclosure.

Despite these measures, enforcement remains a challenge. The law does not prescribe strict punitive actions for failure to spend the full 2%, allowing companies to explain reasons for non-spending. This has led to varied compliance levels, with some companies treating CSR as a checkbox exercise rather than a strategic commitment.

Judicial Interpretations of CSR Obligations

Indian courts have played a role in interpreting CSR provisions, reinforcing the mandatory nature of CSR while balancing practical challenges.

In Tata Steel Limited v. Union of India (2019), the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) held that CSR spending is a legal obligation and not mere charity. The tribunal emphasized that CSR should be integrated into the company’s business strategy and governance framework.

The Supreme Court, in Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India (2019), underscored the importance of CSR in promoting sustainable development goals. The Court recognized CSR as a tool for corporate accountability towards society, not just philanthropy.

These judicial pronouncements affirm that CSR under the Companies Act is a form of mandatory accountability rather than voluntary charity. They also highlight the need for companies to approach CSR with seriousness and transparency.

Impact of Mandatory CSR on Corporate Governance

Mandatory CSR has influenced corporate governance in several ways:

• Board Accountability: The requirement to form a CSR Committee places CSR oversight at the highest governance level, ensuring board members are directly responsible for social initiatives.

• Strategic Integration: Companies are increasingly integrating CSR into their core business strategies, linking social impact with long-term value creation.

• Transparency and Reporting: Enhanced disclosure norms improve transparency, enabling stakeholders to assess CSR performance and hold companies accountable.

• Stakeholder Engagement: CSR mandates encourage companies to engage with diverse stakeholders, including communities, NGOs, and government bodies, fostering inclusive decision-making.

  
  

However, some companies view CSR as a compliance burden rather than an opportunity for value creation. This mindset can limit the potential benefits of CSR on governance and stakeholder relations.

CSR and Stakeholder Theory

Stakeholder theory argues that companies should create value not only for shareholders but also for other stakeholders such as employees, customers, communities, and the environment. Mandatory CSR aligns with this theory by legally requiring companies to address social and environmental concerns.

In India, CSR mandates have expanded the corporate focus beyond profit maximization to include social responsibility. This shift encourages companies to:

• Recognize the interests of marginalized communities.

• Address environmental sustainability.

• Promote inclusive growth.

  
  

This legal framework strengthens the social contract between businesses and society, fostering trust and legitimacy. However, the effectiveness depends on genuine commitment rather than mere compliance.

Effect on Ease of Doing Business

Mandatory CSR introduces additional compliance requirements, which can affect the ease of doing business:

• Administrative Burden: Companies must allocate resources for CSR planning, implementation, and reporting, increasing administrative costs.

• Complexity in Compliance: Understanding eligible activities, maintaining documentation, and filing returns require expertise and time.

• Impact on Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): While CSR applies mainly to large companies, subsidiaries and group companies may face indirect compliance pressures.

  
  

On the other hand, CSR can enhance business reputation, build community goodwill, and reduce regulatory risks, which may improve the overall business environment.

The government has taken steps to ease compliance, such as simplifying reporting formats and allowing pooled CSR funds for smaller companies. These measures aim to balance social objectives with business convenience.

CSR committee meeting in a corporate boardroom

.

Comparative Insights from Global CSR Practices

India’s mandatory CSR model is rare globally. Most countries encourage voluntary CSR through guidelines and incentives rather than legal mandates. For example:

• The United States relies on voluntary CSR initiatives driven by market forces and investor expectations.

• The European Union promotes CSR through non-binding strategies and reporting requirements.

• South Africa’s King IV Code encourages integrated reporting and ethical leadership but does not mandate CSR spending.

  
  

India’s approach offers lessons on the benefits and challenges of legal CSR obligations:

• Benefits: Ensures consistent social investment, promotes accountability, and integrates CSR into governance.

• Challenges: Risks of superficial compliance, administrative burden, and potential diversion from core business goals.

  
  

Countries considering mandatory CSR can learn from India’s experience to design balanced frameworks that encourage meaningful social impact without stifling business growth.

Suggestions to Enhance CSR Effectiveness in India

To improve the CSR framework’s impact, several reforms can be considered:

• Clearer Guidelines on CSR Spending: Define eligible activities more precisely to reduce ambiguity and misuse.

• Stronger Enforcement: Introduce stricter penalties for non-compliance and mechanisms to monitor actual social impact.

• Encourage Strategic CSR: Promote CSR as a business strategy rather than a compliance exercise through capacity building and incentives.

• Facilitate Collaboration: Support partnerships between companies, NGOs, and government for scalable social projects.

• Simplify Reporting: Streamline disclosure requirements to reduce administrative burden while maintaining transparency.

• Expand Scope: Consider including SMEs and startups with tailored CSR obligations to broaden social impact.

  
  

These reforms can help shift CSR from a mandatory duty to a genuine driver of sustainable development.